PhoenixDawn (2014-10-10 22:10:13)

---

I already asked Nait. Totaly not sure if it was a good idea though

---

carlos11: You know. spammers, cussers and SirDavids only ever get banned for no longer than a week. I must be worse than those people, considering the fact that my ban is so long.

Nait is not on my side. You were wrong to come to him and ask questions.

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2014-10-10 22:14:29

---

little5 (2014-10-10 22:20:08)

---

You're bypassing your ban, of course it'll be extended.

Those spammers get banned for 5 days, and 2 more per alt. Swearers are banned for like, 3 days. 2 per alt.

Here you are, originally banned for 2 days, but now you've caused your own ban to be extended.

---

carlos11: I'm not bypassing my ban, idiot.

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2014-10-10 22:27:19

---

AntiChrist (2014-10-10 22:35:43)

---

Media, I know for a fact you just edited your comment to make Carlos seem like he said that. He wouldn't say something that stupid then flat out call someone an idiot. Quit being immature. By the way, 9 days is uneccesary.

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2014-10-10 22:36:28

---

little5 (2014-10-10 22:40:00)

---

What? I legitimately didn't edit my comment.

This is one of the main reasons why I don't want him editing my, or anyone else's comments to post.

Also, how would you know for a fact?

If he wouldn't do that, then why would he call someone a "dumbass", "bastard", and "retarded" in the public chats. Isn't that why he's banned now?

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2014-10-10 22:48:42

---

Nutsy (2014-10-10 22:41:46)

---

We need new mods.

---

carlos11: Yeah. Let's mod QueenObama.

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2014-10-10 22:42:20

---

Leviathan (2014-10-10 22:44:55)

---

Meia has handled this completely wrong. I'm disappointed.

---

AntiChrist (2014-10-10 22:45:07)

---

He's obviously bypassing his ban now. There's no reason he'd deny he was.

---

AntiChrist (2014-10-10 22:46:38)

---

If you really think what he did was that terrible than I don't know what to tell you. If he really did edit your comment, that was a mistake on his part then since clearly he is bypassing.

---

Shalala (2014-10-10 22:48:59)

---

tfw all the drama revolves around the mods

---

carlos11: Once again, I am not bypassing. I repeat, I am not bypassing.

You seem to not know what bypassing a ban really is. The ultimate goal of bypassing is to evade the ban by means which involve not being banned as a result. For example, alt accounts, changing IP addresses, proxies (whatever the hell that means.
Do I make myself clear?

So, am I still banned? Last time I checked, yeah. That's because I am. So what we have here is a loophole. I'm NOT evading the ban itself, but rather, the effects of the ban, t some extent. I can't post or send PMs, but I can still log on. Any banned person log onto their account. The only difference is that I am exploiting a way of interacting with you guys which was not anticipated despite being banned. That's the loophole. It's legal. Bottom line, I'm still banned, therefore I am not bypassing anything.

You guys sound like those kids that claim someone "hacked" their accounts, when in reality that's not the case.

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2014-10-10 23:02:24

---

Nin10dude789 (2014-10-10 22:54:26)

---

Let's help carlos11 and stop those faggots.

---

AntiChrist (2014-10-10 23:01:48)

---

For a second I thought that putting that in our signatures was actually your idea to change Meias mind, but I guess you were joking

@Mega kun

---

Nin10dude789 (2014-10-10 23:07:33)

---

Not a bad idea mega. We should do it.

---

little5 (2014-10-10 23:23:28)

---

Doing that to change my mind?


Pfft. If you want to change my mind, prove to me that it was an unfair ban.

Which is going to be pretty hard, considering the fact that it was legitimate and completely fair.

---

carlos11: I already did. What more irrefutable proof do you want?

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2014-10-10 23:26:22

---

ED (2014-10-10 23:52:00)

---

A mod banning a mod and that mod decides that the "banee" shouldn't be using his moderator privileges, thus expanding the ban.
k

---

Nin10dude789 (2014-10-11 00:34:15)

---

^

---