Nemesis (2016-04-29 01:18:11)

---

The second to last girls look way better. Not anorexic like the other ones.

---

PANZERFAUST (2016-04-29 01:39:24)

---

What the actual ? HALF THE IMAGES WERE REMOVED. They weren't even bad this time, and I made sure of that.
This is not porn. TV commercials are more explicit.

off with your ing overly-prudishness. Just because it's arousing doesn't mean it's ing bad.
EDIT: If you're going to keep removing my images, at least tell me why the you're doing it. This is a bit ing excessive.

@Nemesis I'm about as skinny as AnnaLee, and I'm not anorexic.

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2016-04-29 02:36:12

---

UnhingedTool (2016-04-29 02:13:43)

---

She looks nice.

---

PANZERFAUST (2016-04-29 02:14:47)

---

I know, right? Too bad half the ing images were removed.

---

UnhingedTool (2016-04-29 02:15:11)

---

):<

---

BipolarBear (2016-04-29 02:16:00)

---

Wait, Nintendo does excessive censorship on their games and on sites like Memeverse.
This is a Nintendo fan site. The excessive censorship makes sense.
actually this is BS

---

PANZERFAUST (2016-04-29 02:21:05)

---

And there wasn't even a "[removed]" sign or anything, so I'm going to assume removing them was an accident continue re-posting them until I get an explanation. This removal of posts has been rather inconsistent, so it bloody well could have been a mistake.

[removed] (better?)
EDIT: Nope, still no explanation. These images aren't NSFW.
NSFW (Not Safe For Work) is explained in the thread comment guidelines....it's anything that would be considered inappropriate for the public (the public includes children, your grandmother...people who may be sensitive to explicit things). So graphic amounts of gore, nudity, sexual depictions or content (which may or may not include nudity), stronge language, or other disturbing things, would all be considered NSFW. -Lani (2016-01-08 14:51:17)
I could literally post these images on my classroom wall and nobody would notice. These images DO NOT have a sexual undertones, nor do they need to be censored any further.
Also note that there isn't anyone else complaining about these images being "too sexual" or "NSFW". The only thing that's been complained about are the tattoos, which some people find look gross on women.


Any further problems, send me a PM. This is getting tiring.

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2016-04-29 02:34:33

---

TheIronMadden (2016-04-29 02:34:05)

---

---

BirdJesus (2016-04-29 02:36:47)

---

>Nintendo does excessive censorship

Nice meme faglord, did you get it from /v/?

---

UnhingedTool (2016-04-29 02:37:22)

---

[Img]https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRnjSMHRzkFWpcx-OxokMy7RG9Y-b-Q4FhtNoVHVjSmRmPWEEGy[/img]

SO ING HOT

---

BirdJesus (2016-04-29 02:40:42)

---

Does being unable to post ass and tits on a children's site really bother you this much?

---

BipolarBear (2016-04-29 02:41:12)

---

too bad i need a microscope to see them panz

---

PANZERFAUST (2016-04-29 02:42:52)

---

But it isn't ass and tits. It's underwear and pretty faces.

Right click and select view image

---

BipolarBear (2016-04-29 02:45:04)

---

Nice meme

---

PANZERFAUST (2016-04-29 02:49:42)

---

I'd like to point out that this was posted on the brony thread and has still not been removed.

[removed]

This was three pages ago. NodePoint commented somewhere below it on the same page, actually responding to the post.

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2016-04-29 03:15:09

---